Impact on Patient Safety

نویسنده

  • Marsha Regenstein
چکیده

ways that other industries have successfully tackled this problem. It also includes detailed analyses of systems failures in the delivery of care to (primarily) hospitalized patients and identifies steps that healthcare institutions can take to reduce their error rates. The report is essentially a call to action for policymakers, providers, and the American public to create a groundswell for change. The report’s real take-away message is that medical errors are infrequently the result of the lone individual. On the contrary, medical errors are the result of a complex series of system-related problems. In the report’s language, the authors call for the healthcare system to “systematically design safety into processes of care.” Thus, error reduction and improved patient safety focus more on designing systems to reduce the likelihood of error and less on identifying the person or persons responsible for the mistake. This chapter describes the findings in the IOM report and summarizes some of the published literature upon which the findings were based. It also describes publicand privateIn October 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System, a report that put the issues of patient safety and medical errors in front of the American public and on the agendas of healthcare institutions, provider associations, consumer groups, the administration, and the Congress seemingly overnight. The national news networks and other media outlets broadcast the startling finding that up to 98,000 people die in hospitals each year as a result of medical errors and countless more are seriously harmed. And, whereas other industries have worked systematically to improve error rates and adverse outcomes over the past several decades, the healthcare industry appears to have made woefully few improvements in patient safety and has essentially maintained high medical error rates over the past 15 years. Despite its shock value and the media attention it received, the IOM report does not include new information about the prevalence of medical errors. It explains the etiology of errors in the healthcare system and describes UNDERSTANDING THE FIRST INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE REPORT AND ITS IMPACT ON PATIENT SAFETY

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

"The Impact of SBAR Communication Model on Observance of Patient Safety Culture by Nurses of the Emergency Department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Qom in 1396"

Introduction: Patient safety in the present age is one of the main components of the quality of health services and clinical governance. One of the most important goals of the health sector is to provide patient safety. Training on safety and human factors is the most important step in ensuring the health and safety of the patient and attention to the phenomenon of professional communication is...

متن کامل

Disturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

In a recent edition of this journal, Mannion and Braithwaite provide a succinct analysis of the emergence, and ultimately limited impact, of what they term the current ‘Safety I’ movement in healthcare. They describe the arc of this field from denial, through engagement via mechanisms and approaches imported from other industries, to the current situation where, despite ‘best efforts,’ error ra...

متن کامل

The impact of body mass index on the external dose rate from patients treated with radioiodine-131: A preliminary study

Introduction: The relation between patient Body Mass Index (BMI) and the external dose rate of thyroid cancer patients treated with 131I has been investigated. Methods: A total of 183 patients treated with 131I were selected randomly and divided according to their administrated activity into three groups: 3.7GBq, 5.5GBq and 7.4GBq. They were also stratified into three gro...

متن کامل

The Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

Who could disagree with the seemingly common-sense reasoning that: “We must learn from the things that go wrong.”? Despite major investments to improve patient safety, relatively few evaluations demonstrate convincing reductions in risk, harm, serious error or death. This disappointing trajectory of improvement from learning from errors or Safety-I as it is sometimes known has led some research...

متن کامل

It Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’

متن کامل

A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

In their recent editorial Mannion and Braithwaite provide an insightful critique of traditional patient safety improvement efforts, and offer a powerful alternative vision based on Safety-II thinking that has the potential to radically transform the way we approach patient safety. In this commentary, I explore how the Safety-II perspective points to new directions for organisational learning in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012